首页> 外文OA文献 >Self-regulation in the Canadian securities industry: Funnel in, funnel out, or funnel away?
【2h】

Self-regulation in the Canadian securities industry: Funnel in, funnel out, or funnel away?

机译:加拿大证券业的自我监管:是进,漏还是出?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The study analysed the processing of complaints against investment brokers and Dealer Members through the Investment Dealer Association (IDA) of Canada's disciplinary system between 2002 and 2007. The cases processed are discussed in relations to a misconduct funnel that examines the IDA's claim that it brought more complaints into the disciplinary system (funnel in), and shows how these complaints were reduced once they entered the system (funnel out), and deflected away from the criminal justice system (funnel away). The results indicate that the IDA was ineffective in disciplining its members because it was unable to handle the more serious and systemic industry problems. To respond to its impossible mandate, the IDA was involved in symbolic management to create a well-crafted image for public consumption of its effectiveness, notwithstanding its inability to do so in practice. The results further increased the call for cross-disciplinary research on securities market regulation.
机译:该研究分析了2002年至2007年间通过加拿大纪律系统的投资交易商协会(IDA)对投资经纪人和交易商成员的投诉的处理情况。讨论了与不当行为漏斗有关的案件,该漏斗检查了IDA声称带来更多利益的说法。投诉进入纪律系统(渠道进入),并显示这些投诉进入系统后如何减少(渠道流出),并转移到刑事司法系统(渠道远离)。结果表明,IDA不能有效地惩戒其成员,因为它无法处理更严重的系统性行业问题。为了响应其不可能完成的任务,IDA参与了符号管理,以创建精心设计的图像,供公众消费,以了解其有效性,尽管实际上它无法这样做。结果进一步增加了对证券市场监管进行跨学科研究的呼声。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lokanan, Mark;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号